Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 838CA200BB3 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 22:29:52 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 8234D160AFB; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 21:29:52 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id C8546160AF0 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 22:29:51 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 63840 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2016 21:29:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@phoenix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@phoenix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@phoenix.apache.org Received: (qmail 63829 invoked by uid 99); 2 Nov 2016 21:29:50 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 21:29:50 +0000 Received: from mail-lf0-f50.google.com (mail-lf0-f50.google.com [209.85.215.50]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 5379D1A018B for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 21:29:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f50.google.com with SMTP id b14so23445670lfg.2 for ; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 14:29:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdj8v8eTnlxUGkJu1EZx9Rr+0uE9go7BiESMxSFaOCoRJqatt6g625pvDunQm3+XkqtGD7rtNxwubJNBA== X-Received: by 10.25.199.198 with SMTP id x189mr3611958lff.164.1478122188383; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 14:29:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.219.212 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 14:29:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <138400355.753235.1478120435722@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1492920808.447318.1476582146609.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1492920808.447318.1476582146609@mail.yahoo.com> <138400355.753235.1478120435722@mail.yahoo.com> From: Andrew Purtell Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 14:29:07 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: 4.8.2 and/or 4.9.0 To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org" , lars hofhansl Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c1a1b6cf92ec00540582397 archived-at: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 21:29:52 -0000 --94eb2c1a1b6cf92ec00540582397 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Yes please I think we need a 4.8.x that fixes PHOENIX-3407 on 1.2+ before moving on to 4.9 and up. On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 2:00 PM, wrote: > Was going to do it this week. Then again, since 4.9.0 does not include the > column encoding I was less enthused about it.If we think we want a 4.8.2 > I'll spin an RC today. > -- Lars > > From: Andrew Purtell > To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org" > Cc: lars hofhansl > Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 11:41 AM > Subject: Re: 4.8.2 and/or 4.9.0 > > Right, I think we should address PHOENIX-3407 in current 4.8.x releases > with a fixed version of it. I don't think we can ever fully understand the > version usage patterns of our users. I've seen folks write in to HBase > lists using 4 year old releases for unfathomable reasons. > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:38 AM, James Taylor > wrote: > > > Thanks, Andrew. One question: are there users on 4.8.0 or 4.8.1 who would > > not want to upgrade to 4.9.0? We're in the voting stage for a 4.9.0 which > > has all the fixes in 4.8 branch (and more) and is compatible (as usual) > > with 4.8 releases through rolling restarts. At SFDC, we'll move to 4.9.0. > > > > One thing is clear, though. Given PHOENIX-3407 (and HBASE-14465), users > on > > HBase 1.2 should not use 4.8.0 or 4.8.1. > > > > Thanks, > > James > > > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Andrew Purtell > > wrote: > > > > > Need help with making a 4.8.2? I could try my hand at making a Phoenix > > > release. > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 7:06 PM, James Taylor > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Current plan is to have a 4.9.0 RC in that same timeframe (by 10/31) > > with > > > > the column encoding work (PHOENIX-1598 and PHOENIX-2565) and > PHOENIX-6 > > > > (atomic insert/update). If it's too much much for you to do both > 4.8.2 > > > and > > > > 4.9 simultaneously, I can volunteer to be the RM for 4.9. > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 6:42 PM, wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > we have 20 jiras against 4.8.2 some of which seem important enough > > ... > > > > and > > > > > over 200 against 4.9.0. > > > > > I think we should start keeping stable branches for longer.As > before > > > I'll > > > > > volunteer doing 4.8.2 as well as a 4.9.0. > > > > > Let's think about a 4.8.2 in two weeks or so, unless there're > vastly > > > > > different opinions. > > > > > > > > > > -- Lars > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards, > > > > > > - Andy > > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > Hein > > > (via Tom White) > > > > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) > > > > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White) --94eb2c1a1b6cf92ec00540582397--