phoenix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Samarth Jain <samarth.j...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 4.8.2 and/or 4.9.0
Date Wed, 02 Nov 2016 21:03:23 GMT
Before cutting the RC, I would like to get
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3436 in. I didn't anticipate
that we will be doing more releases on the 4.8 branch. So didn't checkin
the fixes there. Will work on cherry picking the changes and commit them.

On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 2:00 PM, <larsh@apache.org> wrote:

> Was going to do it this week. Then again, since 4.9.0 does not include the
> column encoding I was less enthused about it.If we think we want a 4.8.2
> I'll spin an RC today.
> -- Lars
>
>       From: Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
>  To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org" <dev@phoenix.apache.org>
> Cc: lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org>
>  Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 11:41 AM
>  Subject: Re: 4.8.2 and/or 4.9.0
>
> Right, I think we should address PHOENIX-3407 in current 4.8.x releases
> with a fixed version of it. I don't think we can ever fully understand the
> version usage patterns of our users. I've seen folks write in to HBase
> lists using 4 year old releases for unfathomable reasons.
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:38 AM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Andrew. One question: are there users on 4.8.0 or 4.8.1 who would
> > not want to upgrade to 4.9.0? We're in the voting stage for a 4.9.0 which
> > has all the fixes in 4.8 branch (and more) and is compatible (as usual)
> > with 4.8 releases through rolling restarts. At SFDC, we'll move to 4.9.0.
> >
> > One thing is clear, though. Given PHOENIX-3407 (and HBASE-14465), users
> on
> > HBase 1.2 should not use 4.8.0 or 4.8.1.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > James
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Need help with making a 4.8.2? I could try my hand at making a Phoenix
> > > release.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 7:06 PM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Current plan is to have a 4.9.0 RC in that same timeframe (by 10/31)
> > with
> > > > the column encoding work (PHOENIX-1598 and PHOENIX-2565) and
> PHOENIX-6
> > > > (atomic insert/update).  If it's too much much for you to do both
> 4.8.2
> > > and
> > > > 4.9 simultaneously, I can volunteer to be the RM for 4.9.
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 6:42 PM, <larsh@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > we have 20 jiras against 4.8.2 some of which seem important enough
> > ...
> > > > and
> > > > > over 200 against 4.9.0.
> > > > > I think we should start keeping stable branches for longer.As
> before
> > > I'll
> > > > > volunteer doing 4.8.2 as well as a 4.9.0.
> > > > > Let's think about a 4.8.2 in two weeks or so, unless there're
> vastly
> > > > > different opinions.
> > > > >
> > > > > -- Lars
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > >    - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > (via Tom White)
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>   - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message