phoenix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org>
Subject Re: 4.8.2 and/or 4.9.0
Date Wed, 02 Nov 2016 21:34:04 GMT
Sounds good, except we've already moved on to 4.9 as we're voting on it
now. Second RC will be up today.

On Wednesday, November 2, 2016, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:

> Yes please I think we need a 4.8.x that fixes PHOENIX-3407 on 1.2+ before
> moving on to 4.9 and up.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 2:00 PM, <larsh@apache.org <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > Was going to do it this week. Then again, since 4.9.0 does not include
> the
> > column encoding I was less enthused about it.If we think we want a 4.8.2
> > I'll spin an RC today.
> > -- Lars
> >
> >       From: Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> >  To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>" <dev@phoenix.apache.org
> <javascript:;>>
> > Cc: lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> >  Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 11:41 AM
> >  Subject: Re: 4.8.2 and/or 4.9.0
> >
> > Right, I think we should address PHOENIX-3407 in current 4.8.x releases
> > with a fixed version of it. I don't think we can ever fully understand
> the
> > version usage patterns of our users. I've seen folks write in to HBase
> > lists using 4 year old releases for unfathomable reasons.
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:38 AM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks, Andrew. One question: are there users on 4.8.0 or 4.8.1 who
> would
> > > not want to upgrade to 4.9.0? We're in the voting stage for a 4.9.0
> which
> > > has all the fixes in 4.8 branch (and more) and is compatible (as usual)
> > > with 4.8 releases through rolling restarts. At SFDC, we'll move to
> 4.9.0.
> > >
> > > One thing is clear, though. Given PHOENIX-3407 (and HBASE-14465), users
> > on
> > > HBase 1.2 should not use 4.8.0 or 4.8.1.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > James
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Need help with making a 4.8.2? I could try my hand at making a
> Phoenix
> > > > release.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 7:06 PM, James Taylor <
> jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Current plan is to have a 4.9.0 RC in that same timeframe (by
> 10/31)
> > > with
> > > > > the column encoding work (PHOENIX-1598 and PHOENIX-2565) and
> > PHOENIX-6
> > > > > (atomic insert/update).  If it's too much much for you to do both
> > 4.8.2
> > > > and
> > > > > 4.9 simultaneously, I can volunteer to be the RM for 4.9.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 6:42 PM, <larsh@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > we have 20 jiras against 4.8.2 some of which seem important
> enough
> > > ...
> > > > > and
> > > > > > over 200 against 4.9.0.
> > > > > > I think we should start keeping stable branches for longer.As
> > before
> > > > I'll
> > > > > > volunteer doing 4.8.2 as well as a 4.9.0.
> > > > > > Let's think about a 4.8.2 in two weeks or so, unless there're
> > vastly
> > > > > > different opinions.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -- Lars
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > >    - Andy
> > > >
> > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > Hein
> > > > (via Tom White)
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >   - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message