Mailing-List: contact dev-help@phoenix.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@phoenix.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAAF1Jdi_W_pJ4+tMuS61nnKO3ch8a4CBycZQjmPV-GO56FH7MA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAF1Jdh7vCebfxkZ4OLiFek6ZOOdK0BSq9hbkUY4xkNac9djYw@mail.gmail.com>
 <699156096.3559007.1469350166402.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
 <CANDVwqgyefkNrj5W-pp64S-iU=b=VBU4+SwJfmUpUY+JLn7K4w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANDVwqjKyeh9kFpHsUn7wghHF6rPk=j46AR52V1Fnkd0OZmieg@mail.gmail.com>
 <57A0BC02.3000100@gmail.com> <CAAF1Jdj6buHOMg5U0EHte7W_AYq0hSQuyz-MoHGNcg4J-qe=Bw@mail.gmail.com>
 <57A12ADE.2040709@gmail.com> <CAAF1Jdi_W_pJ4+tMuS61nnKO3ch8a4CBycZQjmPV-GO56FH7MA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ankit Singhal <ankitsinghal59@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 14:05:20 +0530
Message-ID: <CANDVwqjrx12TCzJOG1qAtm8SHhJnup8wJ8iA_Re-Y4B4MHf5Aw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: new 4.8.0 RC?
To: dev@phoenix.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113edaaebd38f2053926b6eb
archived-at: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 08:35:27 -0000

--001a113edaaebd38f2053926b6eb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Yeah. Let's cut RC from 4.x only as there is not much difference except
PHOENIX-3138, PHOENIX-3128,PHOENIX-3120. Which I think are fine for 4.8.0
too
I'm running some tests for RC so no more commit please.


On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 5:42 AM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org> wrote:

> I only pushed my changes to 4.x, so please let me know if I need to push
> them to 4.8 branches, Ankit.
>
> Would be great to get an RC up today (IST time) for folks to test out
> tomorrow (US time).
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Either works for me. The two changes I'm committing today have just gone
> > to 8 branches instead of 4.
> >
> > Ankit, do you have a preference as RM what to do?
> >
> >
> > James Taylor wrote:
> >
> >> We should, but I don't think anything has been committed against the 4.x
> >> branches that doesn't belong in the release. Maybe we should just delete
> >> the 4.8 branches and recreate them once the RC is up?
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Josh Elser<josh.elser@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Shouldn't we bump the 4.x and master branch to 4.9.0-HBase**-SNAPSHOT? I
> >>> just noticed that we have the same Maven versions on both the 4.8 and
> 4.x
> >>> branch sets.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Ankit Singhal wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Following 4 branches have been created and are now available for
> commits
> >>>> targeted for 4.8.0 only.
> >>>>
> >>>> 4.8-HBase-0.98 (from 4.x-HBase-0.98)
> >>>> 4.8-HBase-1.0 (from 4.x-HBase-1.0)
> >>>> 4.8-HBase-1.1 (from 4.x-HBase-1.1)
> >>>> 4.8-HBase-1.2 (from master)
> >>>>
> >>>> Any commit targeted for 4.8.1 or 4.9+ along with 4.8.0 can go in
> master
> >>>> and
> >>>> 4.x branches now.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Ankit Singhal
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Ankit Singhal<
> ankitsinghal59@gmail.com
> >>>> >
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Ok, Given that 4.8.0 RC is taking time , we can fork 4.8-HBase-x.y
> >>>>
> >>>>> branches so that new features and bugs target for future
> releases(4.9+)
> >>>>> can
> >>>>> be committed in 4.x branches and master.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Whatever is targeted for 4.8.0 needs to be committed in all 8
> >>>>> branches(three 4.x branches , master, four 4.8-HBase-x.y) as all 4.8
> >>>>> releases(including 4.8.0 or 4.8.x) will be done from 4.8-HBase-x.y
> >>>>> branches.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'll create the following new branches tomorrow morning IST,
> >>>>> 4.8-HBase-0.98 (from 4.x-HBase-0.98)
> >>>>> 4.8-HBase-1.0 (from 4.x-HBase-1.0)
> >>>>> 4.8-HBase-1.1 (from 4.x-HBase-1.1)
> >>>>> 4.8-HBase-1.2 (from master)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Let's discuss if someone has any concerns.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> Ankit Singhal
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 2:19 PM,<larsh@apache.org>   wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Also, can we branch 4.8-x in git?That way bigger changes can still go
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> into the 4.x branches, while bugs are fixed in 4.8-x branches.
> >>>>>> -- Lars
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>         From: James Taylor<jamestaylor@apache.org>
> >>>>>>    To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org"<dev@phoenix.apache.org>
> >>>>>>    Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 7:16 PM
> >>>>>>    Subject: new 4.8.0 RC?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> How about a cutting a new RC now that the licensing work is
> complete,
> >>>>>> Ankit? Looks like we can simplify the voting too by just having a
> >>>>>> single
> >>>>>> vote across all versions by just include all the information in one
> >>>>>> VOTE
> >>>>>> thread.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Would be good to get PHOENIX-3078 in too, if possible. We've had a
> few
> >>>>>> other fixes come in which IMHO are all ok to include in the new RC.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> James
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>
>

--001a113edaaebd38f2053926b6eb--