Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC7C2200B29 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 09:31:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id CB05A160A52; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 07:31:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D19D160A51 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 09:31:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 91213 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2016 07:31:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@phoenix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@phoenix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@phoenix.apache.org Received: (qmail 91202 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2016 07:31:13 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 07:31:13 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id BE0EDC0405 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 07:31:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.646 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.646 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WIA2Bxd7NrQT for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 07:31:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with SMTP id 4AE5B5F235 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 07:31:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90739 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2016 07:31:10 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 07:31:10 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FBC42C02A1 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 07:31:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 07:31:10 +0000 (UTC) From: "James Taylor (JIRA)" To: dev@phoenix.incubator.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2999) Upgrading Multi-tenant table to map with namespace using upgradeUtil MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 07:31:15 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15356667#comment-15356667 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-2999: --------------------------------------- Also, please file another JIRA to set the TABLE_TYPE on the link row so we don't need to join back to the SYSTEM.CATALOG table to get it. You could even make that change now if you want since all local indexes are getting created again for 4.8, so it'd be set when the upgrade happens. Then you could just have another filter. Keep in mind that if you only set it for local indexes, you'd want the filter to pass if the attribute is not present. > Upgrading Multi-tenant table to map with namespace using upgradeUtil > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: PHOENIX-2999 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2999 > Project: Phoenix > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 4.8.0 > Reporter: Ankit Singhal > Assignee: Ankit Singhal > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 4.8.0 > > Attachments: PHOENIX-2999.patch, PHOENIX-2999_v1.patch, PHOENIX-2999_v2.patch, PHOENIX-2999_v3.patch > > > currently upgradeUtil doesn't handle multi-tenant table with tenant views properly. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)