Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-phoenix-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-phoenix-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A324B196C6 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 02:24:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50943 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2016 02:24:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-phoenix-dev-archive@phoenix.apache.org Received: (qmail 50886 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2016 02:24:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@phoenix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@phoenix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@phoenix.apache.org Received: (qmail 50875 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2016 02:24:28 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 02:24:28 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 12EFF180542 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 02:24:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.221 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.221 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Adx5Qkd22F3U for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 02:24:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with SMTP id 6BA625FB53 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 02:24:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50532 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2016 02:24:25 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 02:24:25 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id 871542C14E1 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 02:24:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 02:24:25 +0000 (UTC) From: "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" To: dev@phoenix.incubator.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2628) Ensure split when iterating through results handled correctly MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225539#comment-15225539 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-2628: ----------------------------------------- Github user JamesRTaylor commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/156#discussion_r58478944 --- Diff: phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/compile/ScanRanges.java --- @@ -385,9 +387,25 @@ public Scan intersectScan(Scan scan, final byte[] originalStartKey, final byte[] if (scanStopKey.length > 0 && Bytes.compareTo(scanStartKey, scanStopKey) >= 0) { return null; } - newScan.setAttribute(SCAN_ACTUAL_START_ROW, scanStartKey); - newScan.setStartRow(scanStartKey); - newScan.setStopRow(scanStopKey); + if(ScanUtil.isLocalIndex(scan)) { --- End diff -- The code in this if statement can go in the if (keyOffset > 0) if statement instead. We're trying to avoid checks for local indexes. > Ensure split when iterating through results handled correctly > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: PHOENIX-2628 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2628 > Project: Phoenix > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: James Taylor > Assignee: Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla > Fix For: 4.8.0 > > Attachments: PHOENIX-2628-wip.patch, PHOENIX-2628.patch, PHOENIX-2628_v7.patch, PHOENIX-2628_v8.patch > > > We should start with a test case to ensure this works correctly, both for scans and aggregates. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)