phoenix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2628) Ensure split when iterating through results handled correctly
Date Wed, 06 Apr 2016 01:31:25 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15227523#comment-15227523
] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-2628:
-----------------------------------------

Github user JamesRTaylor commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/156#discussion_r58640556
  
    --- Diff: phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/iterate/TableResultIterator.java
---
    @@ -107,8 +127,37 @@ public synchronized void close() throws SQLException {
         @Override
         public synchronized Tuple next() throws SQLException {
             initScanner();
    -        Tuple t = scanIterator.next();
    -        return t;
    +        try {
    +            lastTuple = scanIterator.next();
    +            if (lastTuple != null) {
    +                ImmutableBytesWritable ptr = new ImmutableBytesWritable();
    +                lastTuple.getKey(ptr);
    +            }
    +        } catch (SQLException e) {
    +            try {
    +                throw ServerUtil.parseServerException(e);
    +            } catch(StaleRegionBoundaryCacheException e1) {
    +                if(scan.getAttribute(NON_AGGREGATE_QUERY)!=null) {
    +                    Scan newScan = ScanUtil.newScan(scan);
    +                    if(lastTuple != null) {
    +                        lastTuple.getKey(ptr);
    +                        byte[] startRowSuffix = ByteUtil.copyKeyBytesIfNecessary(ptr);
    +                        if(ScanUtil.isLocalIndex(newScan)) {
    +                            newScan.setAttribute(SCAN_START_ROW_SUFFIX, ByteUtil.nextKey(startRowSuffix));
    +                        } else {
    +                            newScan.setStartRow(ByteUtil.nextKey(startRowSuffix));
    +                        }
    +                    }
    +                    plan.getContext().getConnection().getQueryServices().clearTableRegionCache(htable.getTableName());
    +                    this.scanIterator =
    +                            plan.iterator(DefaultParallelScanGrouper.getInstance(), newScan);
    --- End diff --
    
    Yes, exactly. Except for the ordered aggregation case, which needs to be handled as the
non aggregate is handled (i.e. we'd still throw the stale region boundary exception, but the
client would need to react to it as you've done for the non aggregate case. We need to know
which exact row key we're on though (which the client won't know). Seems like the more feasible
approach would be to include the row key in the exception and deserialize it on the client
side.


> Ensure split when iterating through results handled correctly
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-2628
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2628
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: James Taylor
>            Assignee: Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla
>             Fix For: 4.8.0
>
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-2628-wip.patch, PHOENIX-2628.patch, PHOENIX-2628_v7.patch,
PHOENIX-2628_v8.patch
>
>
> We should start with a test case to ensure this works correctly, both for scans and aggregates.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message