phoenix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From JamesRTaylor <...@git.apache.org>
Subject [GitHub] phoenix pull request: PHOENIX-2628 Ensure split when iterating thr...
Date Wed, 06 Apr 2016 01:30:59 GMT
Github user JamesRTaylor commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/156#discussion_r58640556
  
    --- Diff: phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/iterate/TableResultIterator.java
---
    @@ -107,8 +127,37 @@ public synchronized void close() throws SQLException {
         @Override
         public synchronized Tuple next() throws SQLException {
             initScanner();
    -        Tuple t = scanIterator.next();
    -        return t;
    +        try {
    +            lastTuple = scanIterator.next();
    +            if (lastTuple != null) {
    +                ImmutableBytesWritable ptr = new ImmutableBytesWritable();
    +                lastTuple.getKey(ptr);
    +            }
    +        } catch (SQLException e) {
    +            try {
    +                throw ServerUtil.parseServerException(e);
    +            } catch(StaleRegionBoundaryCacheException e1) {
    +                if(scan.getAttribute(NON_AGGREGATE_QUERY)!=null) {
    +                    Scan newScan = ScanUtil.newScan(scan);
    +                    if(lastTuple != null) {
    +                        lastTuple.getKey(ptr);
    +                        byte[] startRowSuffix = ByteUtil.copyKeyBytesIfNecessary(ptr);
    +                        if(ScanUtil.isLocalIndex(newScan)) {
    +                            newScan.setAttribute(SCAN_START_ROW_SUFFIX, ByteUtil.nextKey(startRowSuffix));
    +                        } else {
    +                            newScan.setStartRow(ByteUtil.nextKey(startRowSuffix));
    +                        }
    +                    }
    +                    plan.getContext().getConnection().getQueryServices().clearTableRegionCache(htable.getTableName());
    +                    this.scanIterator =
    +                            plan.iterator(DefaultParallelScanGrouper.getInstance(), newScan);
    --- End diff --
    
    Yes, exactly. Except for the ordered aggregation case, which needs to be handled as the
non aggregate is handled (i.e. we'd still throw the stale region boundary exception, but the
client would need to react to it as you've done for the non aggregate case. We need to know
which exact row key we're on though (which the client won't know). Seems like the more feasible
approach would be to include the row key in the exception and deserialize it on the client
side.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Mime
View raw message