perl-modperl mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Igor Chudov <ichu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Enquiry about mod_perl project state
Date Tue, 01 Sep 2015 21:45:47 GMT
I make many thousands of $$$ per month from my websites, all of which are
based on mod_perl. I wrote everything myself.

Rewriting them would be undesirable and very cost prohibitive.

I have no real need for any "evolution" and "continued development" of
mod_perl, which I consider to be as perfect as things get. All I want is
for mod_perl to continue working with evolving apache, so:

Do you think that if Apache makes some big changes, mod_perl will follow?

I have a huge money at stake here and my family well being depends sorely
on mod_perl's reliable existence.


On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn@stonehenge.com>
wrote:

> >>>>> "James" == James Smith <js5@sanger.ac.uk> writes:
>
> James> I have watched a number of projects move away from mod_perl -
> James> often to Dancer/ Catalyst etc and then they ask can I do X, Y or
> James> Z...
>
> That's one thing people overlook about mod_perl... it really can
> customize *any* of the 14 phases... most of the other frameworks are
> content-phase only, or some limited insertion into the other phases.
>
> Hmm.  14 sounds too small.  I think that was for apache 1.x.
>
> --
> Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777
> 0095
> <merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
> Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
> Still trying to think of something clever for the fourth line of this .sig
>

Mime
View raw message