perl-modperl mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Randolf Richardson" <>
Subject Re: [URGENT] Do not post below post on Internet
Date Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:54:47 GMT
> Hi.
> You do realise that the more attention you draw to this, the more likely someone is to

> really go search through the dozens of archived versions of these messages, to find what

> you are so worried about ?
> Do as someone wrote earlier : change that information on your servers, now.
> There is no alternative.  By delaying and writing more about it, you only make it worse.
> It is *impossible* for anyone to go now and delete all the copies of these posts.
> If you have been reading any newspapers in the last couple of months, you'll understand

	That was me, and this is what I wrote to Jitendra just 5 hours 
before he/she start this "URGENT" topic:

"Once it has been sent out via eMail, it's up to each recipient to 
delete it.  You won't be able to pull them back because that's the 
nature of eMail, even if it can be removed from the archives (which 
may be mirrored elsewhere already that Apache has no control over).

"Your best bet is to change passwords, etc."

	I do hope that Jitendra had the good sense to change passwords, at 
the very least.  You are correct, André, in that this situation isn't 
going to get any better by drawing more attention to it.  Sigh, it 
seems that Jitendra has a lot to learn about how information can get 
a life of its own once replicated onto the internet.

	It appears that there's some legal babble about designated 
recipients and rules for how the message is to be used.  In addition 
to this being contrary to how the technology works as well as placing 
an unreasonable burden on people, it's also trivially defeated by the 
fact that it was sent to a "designated recipient" (in this case the 
mailing list, I presume).

	I question the veracity of such legal disclaimers anyway because 
recipients didn't agree to them beforehand.  It's fine that there is 
a lecture there, but to claim "intended recipient" is just silly 
because as soon as the sender sends the message, the recipients 
techincally are all "intended" regardless of whether they were 
entered by mistake since it is perfectly reasonable to assume that 
the sender is the one who specified the list of recipients.

	Messages sent to a recipient that happens to be a public mailing 
list can't be recalled (just like how messages sent to individuals 
also can't be recalled, although an individual may, at their 
discretion, delete any message they received).

> wrote:
> > Hi Staveren,
> > 
> > Please do the needful to delete the post, its very urgent.
> > 
> > Met vriendelijke groet / With kind regards,
> > 
> > Jitendra Soni
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ben van Staveren []
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 3:52 PM
> > To:
> > Subject: Re: [URGENT] Do not post below post on Internet
> > 
> > On 08/20/2013 01:59 PM, wrote:
> >> Dear members,
> >>
> >> Request you to not to post below mail discussion with subject line to Internet
due to security reasons:
> > 
> > It's uh, already archived in more places than I care to mention...
> > 
> > 
> > This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary,
or otherwise confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the
sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the e-mail by you is prohibited.
> > 
> > Where allowed by local law, electronic communications with Accenture and its affiliates,
including e-mail and instant messaging (including content), may be scanned by our systems
for the purposes of information security and assessment of internal compliance with Accenture
> > 
> > ______________________________________________________________________________________
> > 
> >
> > 
> > 

Randolf Richardson -
Inter-Corporate Computer & Network Services, Inc.
Beautiful British Columbia, Canada

View raw message