Mailing-List: contact modperl-help@perl.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
To: =?iso-8859-15?Q?Torsten_F=F6rtsch?= <torsten.foertsch@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: Apache2::SubProcess sucks
References: <4B716175.1040902@1200group.com>
 <DFDAA3E2-F6B5-472E-B114-55E9F338382E@animalhead.com>
 <4B802923.4000808@1200group.com>
 <201002202116.22282.torsten.foertsch@gmx.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 21:24:31 +0100
Cc: Mod_perl users <modperl@perl.apache.org>
From: Cosimo Streppone <cosimo@streppone.it>
Message-id: <op.u8f0a5ens5ttvb@cn01>
In-reply-to: <201002202116.22282.torsten.foertsch@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.10 (Win32)

In data 20 febbraio 2010 alle ore 21:16:22, Torsten F�rtsch  
<torsten.foertsch@gmx.net> ha scritto:

> On Saturday 20 February 2010 19:25:39 Tosh Cooey wrote:
>> I do enjoy the fact that nobody really seems to have a simple definitive
>> vanilla fork/spawn process down pat, it seems everyone does what I do,
>> trying this and that stumbling about until they come up with some
>> monstrosity like Torsen has that works under the sheer weight of tricks.
>>
> Well, if I'd said: "Tosh take ModPerl::Something from CPAN and call
> ModPerl::Something::spawn" you'd liked it (no matter what it does  
> internally), right?
>
> That sheer weight of tricks comes down to 3 points:
> [...]

That's really valuable, thanks for sharing.
However, a question:

is this something that should be included in Apache2::SubProcess
to make it better? Or is this something that could be published
another, separate, CPAN distribution?
Or maybe it's already out there?

-- 
Cosimo