perl-modperl mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Lackhoff <>
Subject Re: resend: Bug report re: Apache 2.2.6 on Windows
Date Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:27:27 GMT
On 18.09.2007 15:47 William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

> Yes, of course.  However in the second case, you do not have an inheritable
> file handle.  apr_file_dup simply dups the handle in the current process,
> so the patch can't possibly have the desired effect.
> There is a real concern; under what conditions would stderr_log not be
> initialized.  *therein* lies the bug.

Hmm, I don't understand this, so I cannot say how serious it could be.
My question is: Should I stick with 2.0.59 or upgrade with a patched
This is a production server and the change log lists quite a few
security fixes for the new versions.
As long as all that could be broken is logging, I think I would like to
upgrade or could the change effect other parts as well (security)?

- Michael

View raw message