perl-modperl mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Pang <pa...@earthlink.net>
Subject Re: Internal Server Error
Date Wed, 22 Aug 2007 03:25:08 GMT


-----Original Message-----
>From: Foo JH <jhfoo-ml@extracktor.com>
>Sent: Aug 22, 2007 11:15 AM
>To: Jeff Pang <pangj@earthlink.net>
>Cc: Jordan McLain <jordan.mclain@gmail.com>, modperl@perl.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Internal Server Error
>
>
>> So on the first case,we need to write the handler as 
>> sub handler { my $r = shift; ...}
>> because Apache may call the function directly as Package::Name::handler.
>>
>> on the second case,we write handler as,
>> sub handler { my $class = shift; my $r = shift; ... }
>> because '->' is a method calling.
>>
>> Am I right?
>> btw,I always used the first config.
>Are there any technical advantages with either method, or is it a 
>TIMTOWDI option given to the developers?

I don't see anyone.Modperl's documents say both are fine.

--
Jeff Pang - pangj@earthlink.net
http://home.arcor.de/jeffpang/

Mime
View raw message