Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-perl-modperl-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 2172 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2007 20:18:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Apr 2007 20:18:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 54389 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2007 20:18:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-perl-modperl-archive@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 54371 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2007 20:18:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact modperl-help@perl.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list modperl@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 54355 invoked by uid 99); 17 Apr 2007 20:18:00 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:18:00 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of pharkins@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.249 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.249] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.249) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:17:53 -0700 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b20so2385736ana for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:17:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=lFRMMUT+QXNe6Z9j5k2JslN2E9BAqZEQpQgnSghllbZNyuJY5OCGwR5HuOhT8cTEm59NnKYGI2+IIfOESt8s3qppuIghZHOp+iKlQMYFq3Bi9zky8HuVJjmC4pbJdnGy5uiqX1x9rkI5Ytq1tBGHY0WCuGnmiJxTDuGTNmhjYoY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=QQhEqf24el4gPOUd72MEKcpUsEoryoqiMJcEHaRM0d1g3Z4AAbgbYzOhldzAWyOV1+KUrOe0gSxGinkItSgb0U+8uKFdkj9moHUSAs8euqUVLLRJeyhnYZxjeuarBrU1Ujr2qepIvW18sQ3mmfjPXOaQtxJPDUEl1oKAtoCJ2bM= Received: by 10.100.190.8 with SMTP id n8mr5892835anf.1176841052501; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:17:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.154.15 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:17:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <66887a3d0704171317g6b8a028al16d5c2cb898ee370@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:17:32 -0400 From: "Perrin Harkins" Sender: pharkins@gmail.com To: rcaceres@aasa.com.pe Subject: Re: Growing Up Cc: "Will Fould" , modperl In-Reply-To: <1176840954.3711.20.camel@rcaceres.aasa.com.pe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4b3372230704161221q3c01bebcjf949e5bd8d581a16@mail.gmail.com> <1176840954.3711.20.camel@rcaceres.aasa.com.pe> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 26318ad335bfa32e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 4/17/07, Rafael Caceres wrote: > There is a consideration, regarding using a proxy or a different server, > that has not been brought up: If there is mod_perl based access control > for the static files, then it's basically impossible not to go through a > mod_perl server to serve them. I use mod_auth_tkt. You issue a cookie with credentials, and the C module can use it to check access rights on static files from the proxy server. You have to run apache as your proxy server, but I prefer that anyway. > In fact, I'm not sure what the effect would be in that scenario if a > proxy was used: would it serve the static file regardless of the access > control? No, it would talk to mod_perl every time and not do any caching, unless you have a mis-configured proxy. - Perrin