Mailing-List: contact modperl-help@perl.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: HTML::Mason?
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:04:45 -0400
Message-ID: <30DFBDC75CD5494CBE4C4D408251BF0310BA6F23@ms07.mse2.exchange.ms>
In-Reply-To: <1155697692.12164.7.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Thread-Topic: HTML::Mason?
Thread-Index: AcbA4UXshEC3sVEoRqStWE52o7dfmQAWyMrw
From: "Jesse Erlbaum" <jesse@erlbaum.net>
To: "Perrin Harkins" <perrin@elem.com>
Cc: <modperl@perl.apache.org>

Hi Perrin --=20

> Depending on what you want to use it for, you might also consider just
> using Template Toolkit with the in-line perl option enabled. =20

That's an interesting idea.  I was not familiar with that option.  It is
possible that a full framework is not needed.


> Or... you could write your own!  It would be like the others except
> lighter and faster!  And you could put it on CPAN!

Lol...  I think I'll pass on that.  (Once is enough!)

Is there really a need for Yet Another Web Framework?  At this point,
the value of having my own set of features seems much less than the
value of finding people who can hit the ground running.  Particularly in
this case...  My proverbial "better SSI".


TTYL,

-Jesse-


--
=20
Jesse Erlbaum
The Erlbaum Group
jesse@erlbaum.net
Phone: 212-684-6161
Fax: 212-684-6226
=20