perl-modperl mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jeremy Brooks" <jbroo...@austin.rr.com>
Subject RE: clusters
Date Tue, 09 May 2006 16:41:42 GMT
It certainly is less appealing after reading that.  I've only read a limited
amount about how it functions.  Thank you for pointing that out Perrin.

-Jeremy


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Perrin Harkins [mailto:perrin@elem.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 11:33 AM
> To: Jeremy Brooks
> Cc: 'Ken Perl'; modperl@perl.apache.org
> Subject: RE: clusters
> 
> On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 11:28 -0500, Jeremy Brooks wrote:
> > There's also clustering in MySQL 5 that looks very enticing 
> to me as 
> > an additional layer or scale out and redundancy.  It's not your 
> > typical master/slave scenario and actaully allows for real load 
> > balancing and failover.
> 
> It's a pretty limited system, as described here:
> http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/mysql-cluster-limitations.html
> 
> No referential integrity and no disk storage (!) are the main 
> issues for me.  It might be okay for transient data that you 
> don't care about losing if the power goes out.
> 
> - Perrin


Mime
View raw message