perl-modperl mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tony Clayton <tony-mod_p...@clayton.ca>
Subject Re: survey
Date Fri, 26 Aug 2005 16:56:39 GMT
Quoting Tony Clayton <tony-mod_perl@clayton.ca>:

> Quoting Frank Wiles <frank@wiles.org>:
> 
> > On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:46:36 -0500
> > Tony Clayton <tony-mod_perl@clayton.ca> wrote:
> > 
> > > Quoting Frank Wiles <frank@wiles.org>:
> > > 
> > > > On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:32:33 -0400
> > > > "Christopher H. Laco" <claco@chrislaco.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Part of it may also be that I still see people and posts
> > surprised
> > > > > that  "mod_perl 2 is finished?".
> > > > 
> > > >   That could be as well.  We should really get our 2.0 press
> > release
> > > >   out.  
> > > 
> > > RHEL/Centos 4 are still sitting on 1.99_16, which probably isn't
> > > helping matters.
> > > 
> > 
> >   Definitely not.  Perhaps we should put together some "official"
> >   replacement RPMs for RHEL/Centos to ease everyone's upgrade path.
> 
> 
> I've raised a bug on the Centos site for upgrading to mod_perl
> 2.0.1:
>   http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1001

Oops.. centos won't trump redhat packages.  That's been resolved,
wontfix.
See here instead:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166873

> It is currently assigned to the maintainer of the mod_perl rpm, so
> we'll
> see where that goes - I'll keep an eye on it.  Centos packages
> mod_perl,
> but no extra Apache:: modules.  There are some Apache:: modules
> available from popular downstream rpm repositories such as dag/dries
> which will also need updating.  I'll chase this down with those
> sites,
> too.
> 
> regards,
> Tony
> 
> 




Mime
View raw message