perl-modperl mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erik Aronesty <e...@q32.com>
Subject Re: high throughput perl server
Date Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:54:51 GMT
Your server blocks on reads/accepts. 

It should never do a blocking read or a blocking write.  It must always
check for readability/writability beforehand, and if a partial write has
occurred, defer the processing until the socket is ready.

We really ought to look at the source/guts of ppcgid and merge them.



David Nicol wrote:

>On 5/26/05, Perrin Harkins <perrin@elem.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 14:53 -0400, Erik Aronesty wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>ppcgid kicks it's butt in that arena.
>>>      
>>>
>>>My business partner and I decided on two tactics: he started building a
>>>patch to thttpd to run perl scripts natively as opposed to exec'ing, and
>>>I built a pure perl web server.  I finished first, so we're using that
>>>for now.  But I think that a perl patch to thttpd (including preloading
>>>support) is what we'll be using in the long run... it's the right way to go.
>>>      
>>>
>
>Me too -- mine is on CPAN as HTTP::Server::Singlethreaded, and apps
>written against
>it that have to do DBI calls to serve each page are responsive enough
>to deliver multiple
>pages per second.  I am curious to see which will be the choke point as more
>throughput is needed: the MySQL server or the Singlethreaded.  If it
>turns out that
>there are delays due to ST waiting for DBI results, ST can be made to fork after
>binding the listening ports, but DBI connections must be done after
>the forking, as
>I understand it, at this time.  Currently my ST installation is
>handling my load perfectly
>well as a single thread.
>
>I haven't looked at ppcgid yet, I might lift some code out of it for
>ST if it is licensed
>in a way conducive to that.
>
>  
>

Mime
View raw message