perl-modperl-cvs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stas Bekman <sbek...@stason.org>
Subject Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/lib/ModPerl Code.pm
Date Sat, 15 Apr 2000 09:09:19 GMT
On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Doug MacEachern wrote:

> > > Orwant and friends in "Algorithms with Perl" page 28 claims the first form
> > > is slower.
> 
> faster to *parse*, not faster to *run*.  stas, your benchmarks don't test
> parse time.

The only question I still want to ask you is why do we care about the
parse time, when mod_perl is a preloaded and precompiled. If nothing
should be parsed at the *run time*, why it's important to work on the
*parse time*. I understand that it will make a server start and restart
faster.  Anything else that I've missed? 

Thanks a lot!

______________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman             | JAm_pH    --    Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/      | mod_perl Guide  http://perl.apache.org/guide 
mailto:stas@stason.org  | http://perl.org    http://stason.org/TULARC/
http://singlesheaven.com| http://perlmonth.com http://sourcegarden.org
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Mime
View raw message