Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-perl-embperl-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16730 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2005 03:33:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jul 2005 03:33:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 45987 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2005 03:33:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-perl-embperl-archive@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 45975 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2005 03:33:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact embperl-help@perl.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list embperl@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 45962 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jul 2005 03:33:22 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:33:22 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [24.199.7.110] (HELO net.net-rayman-net.net) (24.199.7.110) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:33:16 -0700 Received: from [192.168.0.101] ([192.168.1.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by net.net-rayman-net.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j6Q3tOoX029344 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:55:29 -0700 Message-ID: <42E5AEBE.40709@rayman.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:32:14 -0700 From: ___cliff rayman___ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: embperl@perl.apache.org Subject: Re: Some philosophical questions References: <42E59654.7010906@nilspace.com> In-Reply-To: <42E59654.7010906@nilspace.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 10.101.10.4 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Neil Gunton wrote: > This may be a little off the usual topic (bug reports, howto etc) but > I am genuinely curious to know what other list members think about it. > Back in 2000 or so, when I started using apache, mod_perl and Embperl, > it was a really dynamic scene and quite exciting with all the > possibilities for cool app development. There were other languages > (Java, PHP) and other competitors within the perl universe (Mason, > Template::Toolkit, AxKit) but in general the mod_perl/Embperl world > seemed like a bright place to be. Now, a few years later, I am not > really seeing all that much in the way of people "out there" talking > about mod_perl, or even Perl. When they do, it's often in the context > of legacy applications, or "old fashioned CGI". Somehow, people have > forgotten about mod_perl and how capable it is. I think that PHP is a lot easier to install and use for the average user/programmer. Maybe more importantly, it is easier to install PHP apps on an ISP's server. Embperl is easy to install, but mod_perl can be tricky and you have to be somewhat of a guru to understand it and use it's power. That is why PHP's popularity is growing much more rapidly than mod_perl. Cliff -- _____cliff_rayman_____________________________________ Business Consulting and Turnaround Management [web] http://www.rayman.com/ [web] http://all-clear-turnaround-management.com/ [eml] cliff -at- rayman.com [phn] 888-736-3802 x701 [fax] 818-743-7404 ______________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: embperl-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: embperl-help@perl.apache.org