Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-perl-embperl-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 90777 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2003 05:32:04 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Sep 2003 05:32:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 40982 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2003 05:31:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-perl-embperl-archive@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 40967 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2003 05:31:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact embperl-help@perl.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list embperl@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 40951 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2003 05:31:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO postit.adam.com.au) (203.2.124.173) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Sep 2003 05:31:38 -0000 Received: from lightning.adam.com.au (lightning.adam.com.au [203.2.124.20]) by postit.adam.com.au (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h8R5YUa5037886 for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 15:04:31 +0930 (CST) Received: (qmail 33096 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2003 05:31:43 -0000 Received: from 202-136-96-134.ip.adam.com.au (HELO mordor.middlearth.net.au) (202.136.96.134) by eden.adam.com.au with SMTP; 27 Sep 2003 05:31:43 -0000 Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 15:16:13 +0930 From: David Lloyd To: Aaron Johnson Cc: Gerald Richter , embperl@perl.apache.org Subject: Re: What's going on with Embperl??? Message-Id: <20030927151613.2f21acd4.lloy0076@adam.com.au> In-Reply-To: <1064516375.15670.41098.camel@development.gina.net> References: <3F68E1E4.9080702@votehere.net> <20030917233102.GA12329@www2.mrbrklyn.com> <3F690389.3050202@votehere.net> <20030918000742.A15134@www2.mrbrklyn.com> <20030919202433.E17949@www2.mrbrklyn.com> <01c001c3831e$936f2c60$f90b0b0a@wingr2> <1064516375.15670.41098.camel@development.gina.net> Organization: David Lloyd X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.5claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hmmm... > > For getting 2.0 out of beta: I use 2.0 for a long time in all my > > projects and it is very stable, there is no reason for not to use it > > in production environment, I really should rename it to 2.0 final. The > > only thing I see is, what Neil mentioned, that there a some (small) > > issuses with old 1.x code, that might be a showstopper, when upgrading > > old projects. > > > > This is not a valid enough reason in my opinion to hold off a release. > 1.x is HTML::Embperl and not Embperl. I think the new package name > indicates there is something more in the change then just a general > update. I have run 2.x and 1.x on the same machine with no problems (in > the later releases of 2.x). I feel as long as it is clearly indicated > in the make process, in the readme and on the Embperl site that there > are known syntax issues between 1.x and 2.x that it OK to release. The > user still has to change his conf file to reflect Embperl vs. > HTML::Embperl to in fact use the updated Isn't going to 2.0 a major release? So if minor things break between 1.X and 2.0, this should be expected? (just a thought of mine) -- The Open Source Business Network in SA ...will be open soon! Watch this space. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: embperl-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: embperl-help@perl.apache.org