Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-perl-docs-dev-archive@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 13776 invoked by uid 500); 28 Aug 2002 09:08:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact docs-dev-help@perl.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list docs-dev@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 13765 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2002 09:08:10 -0000 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020828110738.025030a8@pop.online.no> X-Sender: oh-sle@pop.online.no X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 11:08:22 +0200 To: Stas Bekman From: Per Einar Ellefsen Subject: Re: searching for $^T Cc: docs-dev@perl.apache.org In-Reply-To: <3D6C9084.7090908@stason.org> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020828092602.02516878@pop.online.no> <5.1.0.14.2.20020828101540.024fccf8@pop.online.no> <5.1.0.14.2.20020828104809.0249e3c8@pop.online.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N >>>it would be so much easier if we could say: >>> >>>BuzzWords m/[$@%]\S+/ >> >>That's mostly the same as his first suggestion, adding $ and ^ to the >>acceptable word character list (or something like that). > >ouch, that's true. I've started with several buzzwords, but now the list >is growing. So what'd be the best approach? I think that adding $ and ^ would be acceptable. I don't see how it would catch any wrong words. -- Per Einar Ellefsen pereinar@oslo.online.no --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-dev-help@perl.apache.org