perl-docs-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stas Bekman <s...@stason.org>
Subject Re: cvs commit: modperl-docs TODO
Date Mon, 01 Jul 2002 10:43:21 GMT
Per Einar Ellefsen wrote:
> At 12:22 01.07.2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
> 
>> pereinar@apache.org wrote:
>>
>>> pereinar    2002/07/01 02:08:03
>>>   Modified:    .        TODO
>>>   Log:
>>>   ??? -> date during site migration.
>>>
>>>   Revision  Changes    Path
>>>   1.74      +3 -1      modperl-docs/TODO
>>>
>>>   Index: TODO
>>>   ===================================================================
>>>   RCS file: /home/cvs/modperl-docs/TODO,v
>>>   retrieving revision 1.73
>>>   retrieving revision 1.74
>>>   diff -u -r1.73 -r1.74
>>>   --- TODO      30 Jun 2002 18:24:08 -0000      1.73
>>>   +++ TODO      1 Jul 2002 09:08:02 -0000       1.74
>>>   @@ -146,6 +146,8 @@
>>>    - get Apache team to link to correct place at
>>>      http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html
>>>
>>>   +- set all "???" in Changes to the correct date.
>>>   +
>>>    ====================================================================
>>
>>
>> not sure about this one, one on side the moment you "fix" it you need 
>> to start a new section with "???" again, so what's the gain?
>>
>> the shifting date is there so we don't have to create gazillions 
>> timestamps. Simply close the Changes section when you feel like it 
>> (e.g. after 3-4 months of changes, if there are just a few, or when 
>> there are many changes), but the above TODO entry seems to be like a 
>> bad idea to me.
> 
> 
> Well, we do have to have milestones at *some* points. And atleast when 
> we close them down at release time, there won't be any "???" for a 
> moment, until the next set of changes.

Sure, but then we immediately start a new ??? placeholder, even if we 
don't have any new changes, just so when you add a change you never have 
to remember about the header. This is like always finishing a list with 
',', so you don't have to remember to add it when adding a new item.

> Generally though, I wish we had a better solution than undefined 
> timestamps.

you are most welcome to come up with better ideas :)


__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-dev-help@perl.apache.org


Mime
View raw message