perl-docs-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Per Einar Ellefsen <>
Subject Re: Link to us
Date Thu, 06 Jun 2002 17:46:18 GMT
At 04:07 06.06.2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
>Per Einar Ellefsen wrote:
>>At 18:19 04.06.2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
>>> > Well, it is 88x31, like you asked. It's too long, that's why it looks
>>> > small when compressed to 88 pixels. That's also why I created the other
>>> > one, which makes the modperl text bigger.
>>>True. But you lost the cogs in the bigger one. At least I don't see them.
>>:-) They are both 88x31. However, I removed the cogs in the second one to 
>>make the "modperl" text bigger! Should I maybe make a button that is 
>>bigger but includes both cogs and text?
>My point was that we aren't really allowed to change the logo. And 
>removing half of it, is definitely changing the logo.

Hmm. It's hardly chaning it in a bad way. I know, you ca give me many 
counter-examples, but the logo still stays the same here. We just remove 
the part which isn't necessarily useful for the button.

Anyway, should I go ahead with a bigger version? (the others are bigger)

>>I'm still working on this. The HTML is pretty generic (only filename, 
>>width and height changes -- and width and height aren't really needed 
>>either), so that can go below the table. I'll probably go with the table, 
>>but with thumbnails for the graphics, linked to the bigger one.
>I'm not sure if it's a good idea, since the user won't have a complete 
>feeling on how it's going to look when selecting which banner to use. It 
>helps to see them all together on one page using real size. May be 
>separating buttons and banners on different pages?

Hmm, separating buttons won't help. The problem with having them real-size 
is that there is a lot of additional information to include (alternative 
versions, and description) which won't fit in then.

Per Einar Ellefsen

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message