perl-docs-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stas Bekman <>
Subject Re: releasing DocSet on CPAN
Date Sat, 15 Jun 2002 15:17:06 GMT
Per Einar Ellefsen wrote:
> At 05:24 15.06.2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
>> Thomas Klausner wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 08:14:55PM +0200, Per Einar Ellefsen wrote:
>>>> Yes, it's a difficult point. I guess DocSet could be introduced into 
>>>> the Pod:: or HTML:: categories without anyone complaining, although 
>>>> it looks strange because we can extend DocSet. App:: seems a little 
>>>> too generic though. I guess we could pass with "DocSet" as there are 
>>>> already many modules like that that don't fit into a particular 
>>>> category. But I agree, let's follow the guidelines. So Pod:: would 
>>>> be my pick for lack of a better name.
>>> Pod:: was also my first thought.
>> Definitely not Pod::, as it already works with POD and HTML as source 
>> formats and hopefully will be extended to work with other source 
>> formats in the future. It's also not a general purpose module, it's an 
>> application.
>>> But App:: would also be well suited, because DocSet isn't really
>>> just a module you use in your scripts.
>> Though the only App:: things on CPAN, are actually modules to assist 
>> in app creation.
>> Hmm, how about Bin:: namespace? I guess this is very unixy :)
> No, not Bin::.. seems way too weird.
> Could we maybe suggest a new category for CPAN? Doc::? There are some 
> modules that would fit in that section, such as DocBook::, or other 
> modules that deal with documentation/docsets in another way.

Well then Doc::DocSet will again will be too broad. And we sure thing 
don't want Doc::DocSet::Doc :)

Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker     mod_perl Guide --->

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message