Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-perl-docs-dev-archive@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 19512 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2002 14:15:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact docs-dev-help@perl.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list docs-dev@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 19438 invoked from network); 10 May 2002 14:15:31 -0000 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020510161232.02368ef8@pop.skynet.be> X-Sender: bk240371@pop.skynet.be X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 16:15:13 +0200 To: docs-dev@perl.apache.org From: Per Einar Ellefsen Subject: Re: New Structure In-Reply-To: <3CDBC1A4.3040305@stason.org> References: <20020509152410.C497@zsi.at> <3CDB7BE7.4020901@stason.org> <20020510100331.D447@zsi.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 14:48 10.05.2002, Stas Bekman wrote: >Thomas Klausner wrote: > >>Another issue is that there is documentation >>included in the mod_perl distribution (most of which was located in the now >>removed FAQ section). I'm not sure if we should include this on the site or >>not, and if we do, where. > >of course not, it was completely included in the faqs section, now we are >in the process of removing it. Eventually the src/docs/1.0 will be checked >out into mod_perl-1.x, similar to what we have now in 2.0. Oh and both >versions will checkout docs/general Just one problem in that these FAQs usually presented a small subject in a pretty useful way, and are commonly referred to. With the .htaccess file I changed all the links, but that won't work anymore as we have removed them. Furthermore, if these FAQs aren't in our docs anymore, they should be removed from the dts too, as I don't like the fact of having a separation between dist-docs and docs. >Say, should I s|general|common| ? > >Anyway, the guide and all the standalone faqs have lived their lives well >and now it's time to put them to rest. The new unified documentation >structure comes to replace them all. > >I guess it's fine if we continue to refer to the whole documentation as a >Guide. In fact I like the idea, since it helps to have a nice name for the >docs. > >The king is dead, welcome the new king. > >what do you think? we could even rename s|src/docs|src/guide| No :) docs is good. It's what it's *usually* named :) -- Per Einar Ellefsen per.einar@skynet.be --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-dev-help@perl.apache.org