Mailing-List: contact docs-dev-help@perl.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <3C2B690D.D9BC0EF1@inet.uni2.dk>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 19:31:41 +0100
From: allan <lambretta@inet.uni2.dk>
Reply-To: lambretta@inet.uni2.dk
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stas Bekman <stas@stason.org>
CC: Thomas Klausner <domm@zsi.at>, docs-dev@perl.apache.org
Subject: Re: mod_perl_site [design discussion]
References: <3C212035.40F2FD28@inet.uni2.dk> <3C214651.8000105@stason.org>
 <3C226490.C79CE166@inet.uni2.dk> <3C22CE90.5030207@stason.org>
 <3C2A4CB9.6C8725B8@inet.uni2.dk> <3C2A83B7.9070802@stason.org>
 <3C2B398E.202527AA@inet.uni2.dk> <3C2B51E9.6030907@stason.org>
 <20011227183300.B940@zsi.at> <3C2B5F9E.3040401@stason.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Stas Bekman wrote:
> 
> Thomas Klausner wrote:
> 
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 12:52:57AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >
> >>So what do you think, should we drop [toc] or [top]? or should we keep both?
> >>
> > I'd say we drop TOC.
> >
> > * as both link to nearly the same place, I think one is enough
> > * TOP is understandable to people that don't speak english that well. TOC
> > (as an abbrevation of Table Of Content) is a little harder to understand
> > (at least I didn't know what it should mean when I first discovered it, but
> > after clicking on it and finding myself on a Table Of Content I got it...)
> > So I'd prefer TOP
> 
> +1 on dropping TOC.
+1 on dropping TOC.

./allan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-dev-help@perl.apache.org