Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-perl-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 30727 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2011 05:06:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Feb 2011 05:06:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 33064 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2011 05:06:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-perl-dev-archive@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 32884 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2011 05:06:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@perl.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 32875 invoked by uid 99); 20 Feb 2011 05:06:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 05:06:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.177] (HELO mail-wy0-f177.google.com) (74.125.82.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 05:06:03 +0000 Received: by wyf22 with SMTP id 22so5279487wyf.22 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 21:05:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.27.67 with SMTP id d45mr35688wea.53.1298178341303; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 21:05:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.66.194 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 21:05:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D602FE2.8030702@p6m7g8.com> References: <4D600FE4.6090509@p6m7g8.com> <4D602FE2.8030702@p6m7g8.com> Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 21:05:41 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Retiring mod_perl 1.3.x From: Fred Moyer To: "Philip M. Gollucci" Cc: Perrin Harkins , mod_perl Dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable One more comment - if this helps take some load off infrastructure@ and allows them to give us help with other needs, I see benefits there. So my official vote is +1 for retiring after the 1.32 final release :) On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > On 2/19/2011 2:50 PM, Perrin Harkins wrote: >> I guess my question is how would this be any different from what we're >> doing now? =A0Is anyone actively working on mod_perl 1 development, >> except when a security issue is raised? > Its 'official', good practice, and prudent :) > > The security practice is biggest thing. =A0But the way we handle it > standard with other ASF projects and other 3rd Parties (i.e. FreeBSD). > > > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 =A03F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C > Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 > VP Apache Infrastructure; Member, Apache Software Foundation > Committer, =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0FreeBSD Foundat= ion > Consultant, =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 P6M7G8 Inc. > Sr. System Admin, =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Ridecharge Inc. > > Work like you don't need the money, > love like you'll never get hurt, > and dance like nobody's watching. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org