Mailing-List: contact dev-help@perl.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4BC7DCA4.8010602@p6m7g8.com>
References: <4BC7DCA4.8010602@p6m7g8.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:01:09 -0700
Message-ID: <p2kad28918e1004161201u70abb1d3mba18b79941e091@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: lets not forget we are a CTR PMC
From: Fred Moyer <fred@redhotpenguin.com>
To: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com>
Cc: dev@perl.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Philip M. Gollucci
<pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> wrote:
> Thats Commit Then Review. =A0Its a VC we can always revert things.

True, but I think that reverting things rarely (if ever) happens.

> The RTC (Review Then Committ) suggestion is only for new committers while
> they get acclimated. Unless its some massive architectural change which w=
ill
> probably be prose explanation anyway.

I think this is still worthwhile even for veteran committers (note
that I'm not one of those!).  Once code is committed, I think there is
less motivation to review it, but that's just my opinion.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org