Mailing-List: contact dev-help@perl.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <47309AB2.6040102@modperlcookbook.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 11:47:46 -0500
From: Geoffrey Young <geoff@modperlcookbook.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070727)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@perl.apache.org
CC: Tim.Bunce@pobox.com
Subject: [Fwd: [rt.cpan.org #30061] $r->pnotes stores aliases not copies so
 is subject to action at a distance]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

so, I've been thinking a bit about this and I think I recall the
original reasoning way back when...

  my $obj = $class->new();
  $r->pnotes(OBJ => $obj);

I am almost certain that this was the original use case for pnotes as I
dig into my mind and recall the time on the list where folks were like
"wow!  we can pass a perl scalar around the request."  what this, um,
feature allows users to do is alter the underlying object without
re-storing it along the way:

  $obj->update_user();
  # next guy to pull it from pnotes gets the current state

over the years I think we will find that people do that kind of thing
_all the time_ with pnotes.

anyway, I'm not arguing here, but I was trying to figure out why it was
done this way in the first place - doug didn't just do stuff at random,
but tended to add features that were dwimmy for the use-cases of the
dot-com era :)

--Geoff

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #30061] $r->pnotes stores aliases not copies so is
subject to action at a distance
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 11:31:51 -0500
From: Tim_Bunce via RT <bug-mod_perl@rt.cpan.org>
Reply-To: bug-mod_perl@rt.cpan.org
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
References: <RT-Ticket-30061@rt.cpan.org>


       Queue: mod_perl
 Ticket <URL: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=30061 >

I've just been bitten by this bug again!

What's wrong with this code:

sub foo {
    my ($r, $status, $why) = @_;
    $r->pnotes('foo', ($why) ? "$status:$why" : $status);
    return;
}

Nothing, except it doesn't work as expected due to this pnotes bug: If
the same code is
called in a sub-request then the pnote of $r->prev is magically updated
at a distance to the
same value!

Try explain why that is to anyone not deeply familar with perl internals!

The fix is to avoid pnotes taking a ref to the invisible op_targ
embededed in the code by
passing a simple lexical variable as the actual argument. That can be
done in-line like this:

sub mark_as_internally_redirected {
    my ($r, $status, $why) = @_;
    $r->pnotes('foo', my $tmp = (($why) ? "$status:$why" : $status));
    return;
}

At the very least the docs need a big warning that the second argument
to the pnotes
method should only be a simple lexical variable.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org