Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-perl-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 81952 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2005 20:24:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Sep 2005 20:24:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 95668 invoked by uid 500); 21 Sep 2005 20:24:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-perl-dev-archive@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 95656 invoked by uid 500); 21 Sep 2005 20:24:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@perl.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 95643 invoked by uid 99); 21 Sep 2005 20:24:39 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:24:39 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [195.80.154.36] (HELO mail.logilune.com) (195.80.154.36) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:24:47 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.logilune.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.logilune.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B7FDD6E98; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:24:16 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4331C16F.5050100@stason.org> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:24:15 -0700 From: Stas Bekman Organization: Hope, Humanized User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.11) Gecko/20050729 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, he, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Geoffrey Young , mod_perl Dev Subject: Re: apache2-rename-unstable branch References: <4331A8E2.7000506@stason.org> <4331C0A4.4000303@modperlcookbook.org> In-Reply-To: <4331C0A4.4000303@modperlcookbook.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Geoffrey Young wrote: > > > Stas Bekman wrote: > >> Hey Geoff, shouldn't the apache2-rename-unstable branch be nuked? > > I'm not sure that you delete branches in svn. probably best to ask on > the dev list and get input from folks like joe and philippe who grok svn > better than I do. I don't think it has anything to do with the understanding of svn. It's just that if something is dead why keeping it around? All the changes from that branch were merged into the trunk anyway, so it doesn't have any extra value besides the painful memories. -- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://mailchannels.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org