perl-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stas Bekman <>
Subject Re: additional APR::Status::is_* functions?
Date Tue, 10 May 2005 05:09:43 GMT
Randy Kobes wrote:
> Yes, it's recommended that the APR_STATUS_IS_* macros are
> used.  In a small set of cases where the error code is
> "invented" by APR like APR_EOF, it doesn't really make any
> difference, but I suppose possibly that could change in the
> future so better to be safe than sorry...
> What I'm wondering, in light of the official 2.0 release
> soon, is if we were to "convert" to using APR_STATUS_IS_*
> for checking all error codes for which there's an existing
> APR::Const::*, it might be an idea to do it now, so that
> it's in the official 2.0 from the start (I could do that
> in the next couple of days, including updating the docs).
> If not, that's cool too ...

Are you talking abouot the perl core?  C code? certainly docs should be 
updated. If you have the time, go for it Randy, though let's enable only 
those macros that we use as previously discussed.

Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker     mod_perl Guide --->

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message