perl-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stas Bekman <s...@stason.org>
Subject Re: additional APR::Status::is_* functions?
Date Tue, 10 May 2005 05:09:43 GMT
Randy Kobes wrote:
[...]
> Yes, it's recommended that the APR_STATUS_IS_* macros are
> used.  In a small set of cases where the error code is
> "invented" by APR like APR_EOF, it doesn't really make any
> difference, but I suppose possibly that could change in the
> future so better to be safe than sorry...
[...]
> What I'm wondering, in light of the official 2.0 release
> soon, is if we were to "convert" to using APR_STATUS_IS_*
> for checking all error codes for which there's an existing
> APR::Const::*, it might be an idea to do it now, so that
> it's in the official 2.0 from the start (I could do that
> in the next couple of days, including updating the docs).
> If not, that's cool too ...

Are you talking abouot the perl core?  C code? certainly docs should be 
updated. If you have the time, go for it Randy, though let's enable only 
those macros that we use as previously discussed.


-- 
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org


Mime
View raw message