perl-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stas Bekman <>
Subject Re: [TODO] completed
Date Sat, 23 Apr 2005 21:54:42 GMT
Randy Kobes wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Stas Bekman wrote:
>>Randy Kobes wrote:
> [ .. ]
>>>That'd be nice to clean this up ... I'm wondering
>>>though about having, in particular, apr-ext tests for
>>>that simply load the modules. In looking at the corrsponding
>>>responses in t/response/TestAPR/, it appears in their
>>>current form that all 3 of these require mod_perl to do
>>>their work. Might having a corresponding apr-ext test lead
>>>some to believe that these function outside of mod_perl, and
>>>so in this context their presence could be considered
>>>somewhat misleading?
>>That's correct for the socket modules, as there is no way
>>to get the apr socket at the moment but via mod_perl. but
>>what's wrong with brigade API?  you can create one
>>   $bb = APR::Brigade->new($pool, APR::BucketAlloc->new($pool));
> That's right - I don't know why I didn't recognize this
> at the time we were refactoring the apr/apr-ext tests.
> How about the following diff, which adds a brigade test
> to apr-ext?


Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker     mod_perl Guide --->

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message