Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-perl-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 8185 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2004 21:18:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Dec 2004 21:18:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 7068 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2004 20:19:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-perl-dev-archive@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 6816 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2004 20:19:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@perl.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 6719 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2004 20:18:57 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from mail.logilune.com (HELO mail.logilune.com) (195.80.154.36) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:18:50 -0800 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.logilune.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.logilune.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B0A1E1DD9; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 21:18:36 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41BF4A9B.9040408@stason.org> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 15:18:35 -0500 From: Stas Bekman Organization: Hope, Humanized User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, he, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Markus Wichitill Cc: modperl-dev Subject: Re: [mp2] t/modperl/util hangs on Linux References: <41BE0306.2070602@gmx.de> <41BE0598.6010106@stason.org> <41BE07D3.1070406@gmx.de> <41BE1078.2090304@stason.org> <41BE1CE7.20406@gmx.de> <41BE2386.3080106@stason.org> <41BE25FC.2060606@gmx.de> <41BE3026.5030009@stason.org> <41BEF92E.1030409@stason.org> <41BF129C.5090605@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <41BF129C.5090605@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Markus Wichitill wrote: > Stas Bekman wrote: > >> Markus, any difference if you replace both occurences of newSVpvf with >> >> 1) Perl_form(aTHX_ "0x%lx", (unsigned long)aTHX) > > > t/modperl/util....1..1 > # Running under perl version 5.008006 for linux > # Current time local: Tue Dec 14 16:32:57 2004 > # Current time GMT: Tue Dec 14 15:32:57 2004 > # Using Test.pm version 1.25 > # Using Apache/Test.pm version 1.18 > # testing : perl interpreter id > # expected: (?-xism:0x\w+) > # received: undef > not ok 1 > FAILED test 1 it was a bad idea anyway, since it requires you to copy the resulting string. >> 2) Perl_newSVpvf(aTHX_ "0x%lx", (unsigned long)aTHX) > > > Succeeds. really? That's strange. I guess I'll just use it then. -- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org