Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-perl-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 62253 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2004 14:30:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Nov 2004 14:30:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 90866 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2004 14:30:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-perl-dev-archive@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 90842 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2004 14:30:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@perl.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 90824 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2004 14:30:33 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from secure.exclamationlabs.net (HELO secure.exclamationlabs.net) (66.77.29.165) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 06:30:31 -0800 Received: from [192.168.2.160] (pcp0010804675pcs.walngs01.pa.comcast.net [69.142.163.148]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by secure.exclamationlabs.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iATEURu07661; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 08:30:27 -0600 Message-ID: <41AB3280.3070001@modperlcookbook.org> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 09:30:24 -0500 From: Geoffrey Young User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040927 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stas Bekman CC: mod_perl Dev Subject: Re: t/modules/proxy.t fails with httpd-2.1 References: <41A7A22D.5010607@stason.org> In-Reply-To: <41A7A22D.5010607@stason.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Stas Bekman wrote: > I can't recall whether this was discussed before, but t/modules/proxy.t > fails with httpd-2.1. Is anybody following the mod_proxy changes? yes, joe orton and I have been following this. IIRC what happened is that joe figured out the issue and placed it in 2.2 showstoppers, but that hasn't been enough to coerce the committer who introduced the breakage (which can be reproduced with mod_rewrite) to investigate further. --Geoff --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org