perl-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stas Bekman <>
Subject Re: [mp2] anybody with 2.0.47 and 2.0.48 apache builds?
Date Sun, 03 Oct 2004 21:01:19 GMT
Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Stas Bekman <> writes:
>>Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>>>- why upcased SV, P?
>>>Because a lowercase "sv" appears in the macro as
>>>an attribute of acct.  Using a lowercase "sv" in the macro argument
>>>will confuse the preprocessor.
>>so will choosing a different variable name work?
>>At least that's the practice we have been using so far.
>>Or do you think it's better to just use upcased equivalents?
> I don't have any trouble reading it either way.  I just
> upcased the macro argument to work around the preprocessor 
> issue. If you'd prefer I renamed it "psv" or "obj" or something
> else, just let me know.

s/SV/acct_sv/; s/P/pool/ ?

Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker     mod_perl Guide --->

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message