Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-perl-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 13917 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2004 18:16:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Aug 2004 18:16:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 52366 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2004 18:16:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-perl-dev-archive@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 52353 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2004 18:16:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@perl.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 52337 invoked by uid 99); 9 Aug 2004 18:16:39 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [195.154.174.52] (HELO mail.logilune.com) (195.154.174.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 11:16:39 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.logilune.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.logilune.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FD221E19FD; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 20:16:36 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4117BF83.1000303@stason.org> Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 11:16:35 -0700 From: Stas Bekman Organization: Hope, Humanized User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040708 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, he, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Philippe M. Chiasson" Cc: dev@perl.apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/todo release References: <20040807025208.63372.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> <4114477A.3090008@stason.org> <411537C1.2060408@ectoplasm.org> <41153AB6.70506@stason.org> <41153C4A.6020506@ectoplasm.org> <4115466E.8010508@stason.org> <4117B738.4020603@ectoplasm.org> In-Reply-To: <4117B738.4020603@ectoplasm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: > More like > > DIR > SRV > ALL > ALL -DIR (SRV & HTACCESS) > ALL -HTACCESS (SRV & DIR) > > So, I'd suggest this naming > > MP_CMD_DIR_... > MP_CMD_SRV_... > MP_CMD_ALL_... > > with 2 new macros : > MP_CMD_NO_DIR > MP_CMD_NO_HTACCESS > > To add to the top of a directive handler ? Yes, but using those you can't tell from the declaration the scope of the directive. Is it really incovenient to have top-level declaration macros that tell it all? -- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org