Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-perl-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 57001 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2004 00:13:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Aug 2004 00:13:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 80813 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2004 00:13:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-perl-dev-archive@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 80781 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2004 00:13:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@perl.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 80760 invoked by uid 99); 6 Aug 2004 00:13:24 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [66.77.29.165] (HELO secure.exclamationlabs.net) (66.77.29.165) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Aug 2004 17:13:22 -0700 Received: from modperlcookbook.org (pcp04036320pcs.walngs01.pa.comcast.net [68.81.212.103]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by secure.exclamationlabs.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i760DBm04540; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 19:13:11 -0500 Message-ID: <4112CCFB.5040202@modperlcookbook.org> Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 20:12:43 -0400 From: Geoffrey Young User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040510 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stas Bekman CC: dev@perl.apache.org, joe+gmane@sunstarsys.com Subject: Re: apr core dumps with 2.1 References: <4112805A.5030103@modperlcookbook.org> <87k6wd9zu8.fsf@gemini.sunstarsys.com> <41129D35.4020800@modperlcookbook.org> <4112C67B.7080208@stason.org> In-Reply-To: <4112C67B.7080208@stason.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.83.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > Are you sure that httpd_version_as_int is the right method to decide > which apr is used? nope, and now that you mention it, it certainly assumes you got apr from httpd. > Is there a better way? I can't think of one, but I obviously don't have my apr chops lately. but you're right, we should make it apr-specific and not httpd-specific if at all possible. > > +1, > > but after you commit we need to refactor the obvious dups (4 in your > patch): ok, commit first then refactor. > into one place, preferrably in Apache::Build, e.g. so that they are > callable as: > > $build->apr_util > $build->apu_util $build->apr_config and $build->apu_config? that is, if the call is supposed to return the path to tbe binary. > If you don't have the time, commit your patch and I'll refactor it next. > I want to do some extra refactoring on the libs stuff. if you have a clear picture of what you want the refactoring to look like, I'll just let you handle it after we get it working again. if you don't care, I'll give it a whirl. --Geoff --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org