perl-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stas Bekman <s...@stason.org>
Subject Re: time for 1.99_15?
Date Fri, 13 Aug 2004 17:08:41 GMT
Steve Hay wrote:
> Geoffrey Young wrote:
> 
> 
>>Stas Bekman wrote:
>> 
>>
>>
>>>Yesterday I've fixed the problems that were showstoppers for the _15
>>>release. Any objections for doing it in the next few days?
>>>
>>>If there are none, any volunteers to do this release?
>>>
>>>We could get an RC right now, let it cook over the weekend and if
>>>everything goes well release on Monday?
>>>   
>>>
>>
>>in general I don't think much testing gets done over the weekend, so if
>>you're serious about getting candidate results better to let it sit until
>>tuesday so that people can test on monday (as the EU people have gone to the
>>pub already today).
>>
> 
> I would agree with that (being in the UK and knowing that I won't be 
> doing this stuff over the weekend (starting about now!) ;)

:)

> Just tried the latest CVS with 2.0.49 / 5.8.4 (I really must upgrade 
> them sometime too!):
> 
> Failed Test                   Stat Wstat Total Fail  Failed  List of Failed
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> t\filter\out_bbs_filebucket.t               10   10 100.00%  1-10
> t\hooks\authen_digest.t                      7    1  14.29%  7
> 7 tests and 12 subtests skipped.
> Failed 2/210 test scripts, 99.05% okay. 11/3691 subtests failed, 99.70% 
> okay.

Thanks Steve

> (I also got "Scalars leaked: 1" twice from t\perl\ithreads.t)

I get those too once in a while, and sometimes failures, nothing has 
changed here.

> More details separately.
> 
> ModPerl-Registry test all OK, but with these warnings twice over (once 
> from t\closure.t and once from t\perlrun_extload.t):
> 
> Prototype mismatch: sub 
> ModPerl::ROOT::ModPerl::PerlRun::C_3a_Temp_modperl_2d2_2e0_ModPerl_2dRegistry_t_cgi_2dbin_closure_2epl::t_cmp:

> none vs ($$;$) at C:/apache2/perl5/lib/Exporter.pm line 65.
>  at C:/Temp/modperl-2.0/ModPerl-Registry/t/cgi-bin/closure.pl line 5
> Prototype mismatch: sub 
> ModPerl::ROOT::ModPerl::PerlRun::C_3a_Temp_modperl_2d2_2e0_ModPerl_2dRegistry_t_cgi_2dbin_closure_2epl::t_is_equal:

> none vs ($$) at C:/apache2/perl5/lib/Exporter.pm line 65.
>  at C:/Temp/modperl-2.0/ModPerl-Registry/t/cgi-bin/closure.pl line 5
> Prototype mismatch: sub 
> ModPerl::ROOT::ModPerl::PerlRun::C_3a_Temp_modperl_2d2_2e0_ModPerl_2dRegistry_t_cgi_2dbin_closure_2epl::t_filepath_cmp:

> none vs ($$;$) at C:/apache2/perl5/lib/Exporter.pm line 65.
>  at C:/Temp/modperl-2.0/ModPerl-Registry/t/cgi-bin/closure.pl line 5

Yup, it's because of the reload of the CODE which was deleted. I'm not 
sure what can be done about these. Some time ago, I've spent a lot of 
time trying to get rid of those, working with p5p, but it didn't work 
out. The delete CODE refs (which we do in ModPerl::PerlRun) is as good 
as it gets.

-- 
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org


Mime
View raw message