perl-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stas Bekman <s...@stason.org>
Subject Re: current test failures
Date Mon, 02 Aug 2004 18:06:25 GMT
Geoffrey Young wrote:
>>ah, now it's clear. it's implemented in 2.0.47, right?
>>Hmm, 2.0.47 was released a year ago. Do you think we may be should just
>>drop 2.0.46? I wonder how many 2.0.46 users are out there. Poll the list?
> 
> 
> I'm for dropping back to 2.0.47 outright in the next release.  IIRC libapreq
> requires at least 2.0.47 so we're not alone.  poll the user list (not the
> dev list ;) and you'll get 1001 different opinions :)

right.

>>If not we need to add the C compat layer object to the APR.so linking,
>>which shouldn't be too hard to do.
> 
> 
> sure, if we don't solve it via 2.0.47.

looks like it's the case:

  /* added in APACHE_2_0_47/APR_0_9_4 */
void apr_table_compress(apr_table_t *t, unsigned flags);

-- 
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org


Mime
View raw message