perl-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stas Bekman <s...@stason.org>
Subject Re: [Fwd: Re: The Byterange filter -- a new design -- feel free to rip it to shreds]
Date Mon, 02 Aug 2004 16:24:32 GMT
Geoffrey Young wrote:
> 
> Stas Bekman wrote:
> 
>>Catching up with httpd-dev: So should we adjust our docs/tests to strip
>>the input Range headers too, in addition to C-L in output filters? I'm
>>not quite sure I understand what are the circumstances when this needs
>>to be done.
> 
> 
> no, it is not required to strip Range at the moment - the short answer is to
> just forget about that thread :)
> 
> the long answer is that the issue in the thread is that currently content
> handlers need to serve up all their content, even when byteserving, so that
> the byterange filter has all the data and can work.  the suggestion made in
> the thread is essentially to let content handlers (more specifically
> mod_proxy, which isn't a content handler) do the byteserving themselves, in
> which case they would need to let future filters know that only the
> specified Range is actually coming down the brigade, not the entire content
> for the request.
> 
> to really get a feel for what is going on, see graham's response to one of
> my posts early in the thread
> 
>   http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-dev&m=108972633012892&w=2
> 
> this post seems to sum up where the thread was headed (and the dominant
> httpd-dev mindset) before it was restarted
> 
>   http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-dev&m=108973604000918&w=2

I skimmed through the whole thread in first place, so I'm up to date :) 
But I was left with the impression that at the moment that wrowe was 
talking about the current situation:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-dev&m=108973489919749&w=2

> so basically, I wouldn't worry about Range at all, at least not at the
> moment - we may need to completely redesign our filter API if any of these
> proposed changes become real, but I really don't see that happening in the
> near future, certainly not with 2.0 and probably not even in 2.1.

OK, thanks Geoff.


-- 
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org


Mime
View raw message