Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-perl-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99936 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2004 21:19:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jul 2004 21:19:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 3322 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2004 21:19:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-perl-dev-archive@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 3149 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2004 21:19:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@perl.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 3092 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2004 21:19:07 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [195.154.174.52] (HELO mail.logilune.com) (195.154.174.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 14:19:01 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.logilune.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.logilune.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A130F1E1AD2; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:18:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40EB1727.3040405@stason.org> Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 14:18:31 -0700 From: Stas Bekman Organization: Hope, Humanized User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040617 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, he, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Philippe M. Chiasson" Cc: mod_perl Dev Subject: Re: [Patch mp2] deprecate modperl_config_insert_request's path argument References: <40E604EA.70509@stason.org> <40E9BB8F.6030908@ectoplasm.org> <40EA566F.3050503@stason.org> <40EB0CAF.2010006@ectoplasm.org> In-Reply-To: <40EB0CAF.2010006@ectoplasm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: [...] >>> I've looked at it just now, and I think you are correct. I can't seem >>> to find a reason why we should be doing this. And you are also >>> correcet in saying that a directive for a null r->filename might be >>> treated as a server configuration accidentally. >>> >>> >>>> We don't have any tests for this and I haven't looked at config >>>> stuff for ages, so I'm not sure whether we should keep it or drop it. >>> >>> >>> >>>> What do you think? >>> >>> >>> I think it's a good idea to get rid of it somehow like this : >> >> >> +1! Perfect, +1! -- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org