Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-perl-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 81743 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2004 20:40:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2004 20:40:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 54541 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2004 20:40:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-perl-dev-archive@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 54504 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2004 20:40:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@perl.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 54469 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2004 20:40:25 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [195.154.174.52] (HELO mail.logilune.com) (195.154.174.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 13:40:23 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.logilune.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.logilune.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 603941E1A6D; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:39:57 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40E4769B.1000006@stason.org> Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 13:39:55 -0700 From: Stas Bekman Organization: Hope, Humanized User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040617 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, he, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Philippe M. Chiasson" Cc: dev@perl.apache.org Subject: Re: [mp2 Patch] Make sections strict by default References: <40E08310.9000002@ectoplasm.org> <40E18F54.6080307@stason.org> <40E446A4.5020402@ectoplasm.org> <40E4498B.7070702@stason.org> <40E46025.70402@ectoplasm.org> In-Reply-To: <40E46025.70402@ectoplasm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: > > > Stas Bekman wrote: > >> Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: >> [...] >> >>>> Moreover now that I think about it I'm not quite sure why in the >>>> world someone will want to turn this feature on. Can you please >>>> remind me why was it added at all? If someone wants that badly then >>>> can just wrap the whole section in the eval {} block. >>> >>> >>> >>> As far as I can tell/remember, this is simply a mp1 feature that I >>> wanted to >>> preserve when porting the code to mp2. >>> >>> I agree that it doesn't add much functionnality that an eval {} block >>> wouldn't >>> allow (except maybe if the code _doesn't_ compile at all. >>> >>> How about this? >>> - Implement PerlSectionsNonFatal = 1 >>> - Deprecate StrictPerlSections with a warning, unless MP_COMPAT_1X is >>> selected ? >> >> >> >> If we agree that it has no real added value then we don't want it at all. > > > Unless somebody can come up with a good reason why we need it, I am quite > happy getting rid of this 'feature' I guess you could check the list archives to see why was it added in first place? Doug is known not to add useless features. Quite possible that we miss the reason. -- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org