Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-perl-dev-archive@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 22015 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2003 20:12:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@perl.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 21995 invoked from network); 27 May 2003 20:12:29 -0000 Received: from cn-sfo1-pix-natout.cnet.com (HELO cn-sfo1-g7-2.cnet.com) (206.16.5.38) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 27 May 2003 20:12:29 -0000 Received: from apache.org ([10.16.91.37]) by cn-sfo1-g7-2.cnet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA26397 for ; Tue, 27 May 2003 13:12:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3ED3C6B3.5020506@apache.org> Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 13:12:35 -0700 From: Ian Holsman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@perl.apache.org Subject: is perl re-entrant? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N hi. I just came across a really wierd problem with 5.6.1/apache2 prefork. I have a perl script which does/did the following .. print " .. now .. with straight CGI, this worked fine. but using mod-perl i get some weird & wonderfull errors.. mainly when I used print <