Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-perl-dev-archive@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 69069 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2002 13:21:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@perl.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 69058 invoked from network); 20 May 2002 13:21:05 -0000 Message-ID: <3CE8F83B.2030705@stason.org> Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 21:20:59 +0800 From: Stas Bekman Organization: Hope, Humanized User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/00200205 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@perl.apache.org Subject: modperl 2.0 versioning Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Is mod_perl 2.0 going to use the triplets version format: 2.0.1, 2.0.2, ... or the same as 1x? 2.1, 2.2, etc. I ask because I'm not sure if I should say: In the future mod_perl 2.0 versions the following features are planned to be added. (implying 2.0.1, 2.0.2...) or In the future mod_perl 2.x versions the following features are planned to be added. (implying anything) it's nice not to use the 2.x convention, if we know that 2.0.x is the base. Thanks! __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org