perl-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stas Bekman <s...@stason.org>
Subject Re: dual server setup with 2.0?
Date Tue, 24 Apr 2001 13:47:54 GMT
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Vivek Khera wrote:

> >>>>> "SB" == Stas Bekman <stas@stason.org> writes:
>
> SB> sense to kill the dual server setup as we endorse now (where mod_perl is
> SB> the backend) and have only one server, with different pools.
>
> Another benefit of the front/back end setup is that the ligthweight
> front-ends buffer the output from the heavy mod_perl processes,
> freeing them up quickly to handle more requests.  You don't want
> mod_perl talking directly to slow clients.

Heh, Vivek :) That's exactly the gist of this thread... That's why we are
talking about buffer sizes :)

with 2.0 you can get the same effeciency as you have had before with a
dual server setup.


_____________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman              JAm_pH     --   Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/       mod_perl Guide  http://perl.apache.org/guide
mailto:stas@stason.org   http://apachetoday.com http://logilune.com/
http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org


Mime
View raw message