Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact dev-help@perl.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list dev@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 15701 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2001 17:57:04 -0000 Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (postfix@208.184.13.195) by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 5 Mar 2001 17:57:04 -0000 Received: by yertle.kciLink.com (Postfix, from userid 100) id 792DE2E443; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 12:57:01 -0500 (EST) From: Vivek Khera MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15011.54125.406264.160807@yertle.kciLink.com> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 12:57:01 -0500 To: "modperl-2.0 dev-list" Subject: Re: Inline.pm and the future of XS In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N >>>>> "SB" == Stas Bekman writes: SB> some new library comes out tomorrow, it takes probably minutes to write SB> the glue. SB> Of course it'll take the same time to do the same for XS gurus, but SB> remember that many aren't. The first time I had to make a Perl binding for a C library, it took me about 2 hours to figure out how to do it. Using XS to bind Perl directly to a C API is trivial. Making it perl-ish is the hard part.