Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact dev-help@perl.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list dev@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 35821 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2000 10:49:44 -0000 Received: from mailgate.sergeant.org (HELO mail.sergeant.org) (@194.70.26.133) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Sep 2000 10:49:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 12068 invoked by uid 501); 1 Sep 2000 10:49:44 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Sep 2000 10:49:44 -0000 Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 11:49:44 +0100 (BST) From: Matt Sergeant To: Stas Bekman cc: dev@perl.apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: modperl ToDo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: > On 1 Sep 2000 dougm@locus.apache.org wrote: > > > dougm 00/08/31 22:22:16 > > > > Modified: . ToDo > > Log: > > yippe > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.248 +0 -2 modperl/ToDo > > > > Index: ToDo > > =================================================================== > > RCS file: /home/cvs/modperl/ToDo,v > > retrieving revision 1.247 > > retrieving revision 1.248 > > diff -u -r1.247 -r1.248 > > --- ToDo 2000/08/31 05:35:34 1.247 > > +++ ToDo 2000/09/01 05:22:15 1.248 > > @@ -68,8 +68,6 @@ > > > > - should Apache::Registry use -M or (stat _)[9]? > > Doug, what about this thing? Did I miss a patch? In the guide I warn users > to do $^T = time, if they want to use -M and get the functionality of > (stat _)[9]. Is it different now? What was the original source of the $^T=time idea? Doesn't seem useful or relevant to me - I just use -M, and nobody has complained about that aspect of AxKit yet... -- Fastnet Software Ltd. High Performance Web Specialists Providing mod_perl, XML, Sybase and Oracle solutions Email for training and consultancy availability. http://sergeant.org | AxKit: http://axkit.org