Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact dev-help@perl.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list dev@perl.apache.org Received: (qmail 86858 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2000 09:46:56 -0000 Received: from mailgate.sergeant.org (HELO mail.sergeant.org) (@194.70.26.133) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Aug 2000 09:46:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 28270 invoked by uid 501); 31 Aug 2000 09:46:55 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 31 Aug 2000 09:46:55 -0000 Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 10:46:55 +0100 (BST) From: Matt Sergeant To: Stas Bekman cc: dev@perl.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache::Reload In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: > > Is there any interest in incorporating Apache::Reload into mod_perl > > core? It seems to offer much more than StatINC, and in only a tiny bit > > more code... (I'm not suggesting that this opens any floodgates for other > > little modules incorporated into mod_perl, but this one seems globally > > applicable, rather than limited to any particular domain). > > Sounds nice to me. I'd give it a few more days to be tested before > releasing it in the mainstream since as you can see a few bugs were > spotted, so let's wait before it's polished out. I'm all for innovations, > just trying to be cautious you know. Understood. I believe your co-worker is playing with it as I type :-) > It also depends on when Doug is planning the release of the next version. > If it's far away I guess we can put it into the cvs version now, so people > will have time to test it. > > BTW, Matt, you will need a CVS write access then, since if something > should be patched you can't do it without the access. You will have to ask > Doug to ask Brian to give it to you. Ugh... Well I don't mind too much, but I'd prefer if someone else did the import and submission of patches - I'll just supply diffs if necessary. But if it has to be that way then so be it. > Also it means that you will have to withdraw the package from CPAN, > otherwise people will be confused. You will have to ask Andreas to delete > the last (and all) versions from CPAN. It's not a problem to delete the > packages from CPAN, you will be asked by one of the CPAN maintainers why > you are destroying the package (just letting you know the procedures :) You can do this from the web interface, providing you haven't actually registered the module with CPAN (i.e. listed in the CPAN module list), which I haven't. However I don't see a point in removing it from CPAN - that enables people to use it in older mod_perl installations. What I can/will do is check $mod_perl::VERSION or $Apache::Reload::VERSION on install to ensure its not already there. > Also what about the back compatibility with StatINC -- do you plan to keep > StatINC in the core mod_perl for a while and remove it for 2.0? Like Ask said - its a drop-in replacement, so we could just make StatINC a bunch of aliases for Reload methods. -- Fastnet Software Ltd. High Performance Web Specialists Providing mod_perl, XML, Sybase and Oracle solutions Email for training and consultancy availability. http://sergeant.org | AxKit: http://axkit.org