pdfbox-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alessandro Bellini <a.bellini.2...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: License and naming for derivative works
Date Mon, 08 Jan 2018 06:40:04 GMT
Thanks! ...it will be very useful for everybody

Il 07/Gen/2018 16:54, "Eliot Jones" <elioty@hotmail.co.uk> ha scritto:

> I have been migrating PDFBox to C# in order to provide an Apache 2.0
> licensed solution for working with PDFs in C#.
>
> Repository is here: https://github.com/UglyToad/Pdf
>
> I am almost at the point where I intend to release an alpha version of the
> software to NuGet (Maven equivalent).
>
> I wanted to check what conditions were necessary/polite for releasing this
> derivative work.
>
>
>   *   I am keeping the Apache 2.0 license but should the copyright in my
> license be the copyright from the PDFBox version of the license?
>
>   *   Additionally I assume I must redistribute the NOTICES.txt file
> present in the PDFBox code?
>
>   *   On naming, I was intending to rename the project (not sure what name
> yet) to indicate that much of the code has been rewritten and it’s not an
> official port. This will prevent people filing bugs (of which my version
> will have many) with PDFBox. Is this ok or would this be considered bad
> etiquette?
>
>   *   Are there any other steps I should take to release a work derived
> from PDFBox and managed by the Apache Foundation?
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Eliot Jones
>
> Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
> Windows 10
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message